If you want a reason to go from a q6600 to an i3 it's because you've got a laptop. Of course, once you compare numbers of the q6600 to that of the 4960x you'll be a bit disappointed. If you bought a 4960x today I'd expect it to be viable in five years as well. You're comparing an approximately $851 dollar CPU (at launch time) to a sub $150 processor.
If you want to see the need to give up on a q6600 then you need to compare apples to apples. They also have that pesky need to have a memory controller on the board, are limited to SATA II connections, and reach all the way back to PCI-e 1.0. They introduced the idea of decent multi-core processors, were fun to overclock, and can still hang with modern versions assuming some hefty overclock. I'm not sure if trolling, or unaware of what reality is.
AOL DESKTOP GOLD IS SHIT UPGRADE
So you want someone to show you the value of an upgrade with synthetic benchmarks. I don't quite know how i managed to get such a top tier PC, I am not rich. Windows 11 pro 圆4 (Yes, it's genuinely a good OS)
Razer Huntsman TE (custom white and steel keycaps) Logitech G Pro wireless + Steelseries Prisma XL Logitech G560 |Razer Leviathan | Corsair Void pro RGB |Blue Yeti micĬorsair HX 750i (Platinum, fan off til 300W) Galax RTX 3090 SG 24GB: Often underclocked to 1500Mhz 0.737vĢTB WD SN850 NVME + 1TB Sasmsung 970 Pro NVME + WD AN1500 1TB + 1TB Intel 6000P NVME USB 3.2 Ryzen R7 5800X (PBO tweaked, 4.4-5.05GHz)ĮK Quantum Velocity AM4 + EK Quantum ARGB 3090 w/ active backplate.